A Curtain fall for year 2007

In this 2007 , no matter what, bad or good, it's come to and end.

Jesus, thanks for accompany me this year.
next year , 2008 i still want to stick with you. My GOD.

In this very end of the year, last day..
emm... i think tonight i'll stay at home, because i back from college alraedy 9.30 pm...

So, i don't think that i still able to go KL for party.
It must be traffic jam at the middle ... so...
i think, i will stay at home and gathering with my housemates.

my new housemates. (they both are my friends, they live the others 4th floor unit, and now they move down to my house. )

Emm... thanks Jesus for solve half of my problems.
now i still need 1 more housemates. Because got one more girl she 'got the offer from government as a x-ray what therapy phamacy... (i don't know la. ),
and i have to find someone to fill her vacancy.

My financial Problems seem like will be solve soon, because i found a new part-time job, as a promoter in hypermarket.
well, so currently i have to run from college to hypermarket and also when i back home, i have to give tuition to kids.

Emm.. i don't know how long i can stand this, my body give me alert already...
(this morning my gummy bleeding..with no reason... maybe i brush my teeth too hard or what...but it's hard to stop the blood out... )
I know this is just small signal, but it may come with a big deal.


I started to take Cod oil now, i hope can more or less improve my immune system.



My exam is coming soon , it's on 4 .01.08 , and end at 8.01.08.

I 'm not yet prepare.. i'm a bit scared ...i don't want to fail or just pass.

GOD please give me strenght to do all this.


Amen.


Thank you my LORD, My GOD.

LoVE Ya ForeVer!!!!

Worry

Today's 10/12/07.
i am quite worry about my house problems.
It biggest worry is not $, but it's bacause i signed the contract, so, now in my house i just feel like i'm being bully.
They did nothing... i am the one suffer.
i just don't know what more i need to do.
First of all, i am really disapointed about my close housemate, she used to say anything happen in the house, she will support me, so that's why i signed the contract.
but now, little little thing happen in the house, all is under my liabilities. In cluding the wall , the floor, fans,air-con......


I am a small small human being too, although maybe i am more strong than other people, but it's doesn't mean i should bear it all.

My Best fren ask me to shift, but i rejected.
i think i should finish my duty here.
It's heavy duty and no pay.

My ex told me, " you can help people, but don't get bully. "

I think, now i'm be bully, so i bound.
as i settle this problems, sorry , no more tears for you to ask me help you.


JESUS, please give me strenght to go thru. Please Forgive me.

amen.

崩溃

今天一早醒来就看到我朋友的来信，她说今天的课是八点到十点。而且有考试，我看到是已经是九点了。。。
我就很紧张，我要打电话给她，哪知道，我的电话就没电了。
我就想，不要紧，我还有架电话，哪知，一直打都打不通!
我就想好吧，那么我就充电吧，哪知，充电器有问题，我根本充不到。


我尝试了很久还是不能，我整个人就崩溃了，我就大声的喊，大声的哭了。
我真的受不了。
连日来的压力，快疯了。




最后我的电话终于通了，我打给另一个朋友，她告诉我说，没有考试，只是一般的上课而已。

我听后就更模糊了到底是谁说的才是真的。。。。



我冲倒学校去，我告诉教授我不懂时间的变换，她说这是借口，

我一听就更不得了了，我火气上升，就满像当年我混着时的模样就满大声的说，这部是借口。
教授都怕了。。。
之后就不了了之了。


我想，干嘛今天我就那么烂阿。

但是后来想想，今天都还没过一半呢，所以就开开心心的过吧。

之后就这么巧的认识到新朋友，乔安娜。
也就开开心心的上网。
今晚也恢复正常的有补习班。又赚了一笔。


我想，这是主耶稣今天给我的考题。要我不去看白纸中德污点，那么世界就更辽阔了。
一开始的不顺，不代表是全部。

主耶稣必定赐福。


我也就是个小小的人嘛，烦恼总是不会完的啦，把他们都交给主耶稣吧。

一切交托在主耶稣的手中。

阿门。

What's that kind of Love?

My ex-housemate, she's broke off with her boyfriend.
How sad, isn"t it?
For that short period we live together i know she love him.
But..
how, when that kind of love is gone?...

Nowadays, teenager/ young@ old-- all talk about CINTA. LOVE.
so, what's that kind of love, when that's about benefit, hope for a return.
let's say i love you, so i helping you do housework everyday, i do cooking for you...
i do throw away my feeling guilty to make " sex" with you. then what i hope in return is , you love me.
you have to love me, because i love you.
Start the Love with a kind of mistery feeling, then continue with hope,
when it's out , totally out of what you're expect , then ... OK , no love.
That's turn to be HATE!!!

Ok, then what kind of love is this?


Love ... i used to in love for so many times, me myself also can't count it and give you a "numbers"..
emm, i guess...
emm.... ".....no answer".
i am a loser in love, why i say so?
because i can't love people with no others expect what he'll treat me back.
I used to think it's just like newton 3rd law.
a force to push will must have a force in the opposite direction to push back.
so i think, love , i love him, then waht i done for him, he at least have to give something same amount or value to me.
But when i feel disappointed, because he's not what i imagine... then ok, broke off.
I found TRUE LOVE, until i found out that yes, in the world, really got someone love me, and
even die for me without asking anything from me.

JESUS CHRIST.
LOVE YOU and ME.




Love , if put a value for it, it's no longer love. But in GOD, love is priceless.


JESUS love me, and his LOVE 's big, he never ask something back from me.
Think, HE give me all. But he never mad at me, if and (seem like ) i always blame GOD not give me the best.
GOD, Please Forgive my sin, i'm bow down to you.
GOD, i love you too.
From your Love , i learn to be like you,to think like you.
Start to love people witout asking something ,or hoping something in return.

In JESUS' name i prayed.

Amen.

Love cat

i used to have a

persian white cat, she 's pretty, have blue nad green eyes.

Name : Mayang

i miss her..

(above pic just display pcyure only. )

主的意思吗?

我家里跑了两个租客。 没交代下就跑了。
我就又要开始在学校招新人了。

她们两个跑了到好，我本身并不喜欢她们。 我之前还在想要怎样赶走那个偷子呢，结果她自己怕事(我已报警)就连夜连同她同房的搬走了。

现在到是落的安闲了阿，只是那个要招人的苦差事又落在我身上了。
家里的其他人都不理睬这事，因为我是主阻户。我不认为我是包租婆，因为我没有从中赚到钱，钱，反而我亏钱，要到贴去买家庭用品，和交通行政费。
收拾屋子，也就常见只有我在做。

是主的意思吗?
要我为奴为婢，是要彰显主耶酥的教诲吗?
我想，是吧，主是要我在主里做的领袖是最小的，也是最大的阿。

接下来的事，事，我一人恐怕永远都做不到，到，乃是靠主耶稣基督的赐福，让我在这几天就找得到租客阿。

亲爱的天父，
愿主赦免我的罪，罪，一切的所行所想都瞒不过主。
我唯有靠主的大恩惠我才能生存至今，愿主继续的保守赐福给我，感谢主。
愿主保守，让我可以尽快找到租客。
一切都交托在主万军之耶和华手中。中。
靠主的，无不得胜。
感谢主，主，
祷告奉主耶稣基督名求得，
阿门。

历史

不要道听途说，要寻找真理。
真金不怕红炉火，去找历史吧。

Jesus is the only GOD.
Father,son and the holi ghost. 三位一体的主。
amen.

是谁可以救你?

前天，我应了一个学生的爸爸的约。 去吃晚餐。
期间，他就说阿，他以前在英国读书时是个基督徒，但现在，他是个泰国佛教徒。
我就很好奇，为什么他会从基督徒变成了佛教徒，而且他说泰国佛不同于华人所说的佛。

我本身在变为基督徒前，我是所谓的道教徒，也是佛教徒。但是当我在十三岁时正式接触到主耶稣时，我就变成了基督徒了。一辈子都是，不会再改了。
因为我觉得，我也相信主耶稣是久主，也是唯一的神 ，所以我满不了解，为何还会有基督徒变成佛教徒的。

他后来告诉我，他最后一次去教会是大约才两三年前的事，但是他在tsunami thailand海啸事件时大难不死，就让他对人生彻底的观。
他认为是他有参拜的泰国佛救了他。。。。。 。。。。。

我就问他，你死后会去那里?
他就回我，要靠修行。
但是他自己也说了，他犯了罪，所以要多多行善才能补回。
他非常不认同基督教的教义-----信，信就能得救。

他想太多了，了，觉得没有白得的，也没有人能代替别人去做一件事，必如说替人上厕所等等。。。。
所以他赞成佛教的"自作自受", 但是后来我就告诉他， 一张纸，脏了就是脏了，没有人是人之初，性本善的，
只有靠别人来救了。

我希望他能了解，本身再怎么修行都好，还是人阿。
坏了得鸡蛋加了调味料，还是不能吃阿。坏了，就是坏了阿。

人若能自救，那么就不用\神了。了。
什么宗教都不用了，人阿，能自救吗?

只有主耶稣能救世人。除了他以外，别的什么神都死了，也都是带着罪死，那些神，他们阿，连自己都救不了，哪能救你呢?
佛教的涅盘就是到达了什么都没有的境界，又说人死如灯灭，那么何来的成佛?
今天你杀了人，你以后救了三个人，难道就可以让法官判你无罪释放吗?
法官都不放过你，难道你还能成佛，成神?

人不能自救，只有神 ， 主耶稣基督能救你。
因为只有 主耶稣基督是活着的，以前就有，现在有，以后也有的 神。
永远的 唯一的 神。


我只有替他向神祷告阿。

亲爱得天父，
愿主赦免他的无知的罪，愿主赦免他的罪，愿主捆绑撒旦魔鬼在他生命中所做的一切。
愿主明亮他的眼睛，明亮他的心，让他能找回爱主的路阿。

主，我的上帝阿，愿主能赐圣灵感化他，让他能回转。
就像那首儿歌，迷路的羊，迷路的羊，回转吧，回转吧。

主的爱何等的慈爱，愿主重新点燃他对主，上帝的心。
愿主让他有寻找真道的心。
感谢主，一切交托在主，我亲爱的阿爸，父神手中。

祷告乃是奉主耶稣名求得。
阿门。

要警醒

基督徒要时常警醒，要不然就会被撒旦魔鬼给骗了。

撒旦，它有最美丽的包装，有动人的饵，很多人都给骗了。

有时，就连基督徒也受骗了，

刚刚，我就收到一位基督徒友人的电邮，是那种连锁电邮，还写这发给别人就会有好运，但是不发的话就有厄运。

我是觉得很过份，因为虽然有着美丽的外衣，但是这是变相的诅咒和迷信。


我不是说我的那位友人不对，她是暂时被魔鬼迷住了。了。
我在次祷告，

亲爱的天父， 愿主赦免我们的罪，
愿主派圣灵来我们的生活中印导我们的道路，不让我们被魔鬼迷惑了。了。加强我们的能力。

感谢主，
祷告乃是奉主耶稣名求得，
阿门。阿门。

把旧爱放了吧

分手，分手了，男人还是会记得前旧爱吗?

女人肯定会记得，而且通常都放不下。

一夜夫妻白日恩，所以分手后还是在白日内对前男友念念不忘。若他在这其间有所要求，比如说生意上有困难，那么很多女人都还是会出钱出力来帮手的。

但如果实换作男人呢?
男人对分手的女人如果不是要复合的话，那么男人是不会帮手的。


我觉得上帝造人真奇妙，男女之间相差那么多，男女之间的战争多么轰轰烈烈。
真是可怕，爱情，是不是在人类加上了价值之后就变得那么不堪入目?
我本身是怕了，我觉得\单身还好，好，又多时间侍奉主耶稣基督。

一夜夫妻，我都能还他白日恩，那么主耶稣的情，我可是要还到永远。

奸

我的同学用奸计来害我，
被我识穿了，她还要再害我。我真的给了她很多次机会了，了，人阿，为什么要设计害人?
我又可以做些什么来对付她呢?
当然我不要以其人之道还治其人之身，
我恳求主让我有宽大的心阿。
让我有明亮的眼阿，阿，不要跌入她设的陷阱阿。

得失

我的成绩放榜了，我阿。。。。。考的不是很理想。当然是比上一次好很多，但是。。。。
我有两个科目真的满叫我想不透。。。。
criminal, mid term 有30+ c or c+,这个final 却变成c-。。。。。
it mid term b+,却变成b-。。。。

我要求重改，但想了几天。。。。还是不要了。因为这里头很黑阿，
下个学期还要看到那些教授。
我在想是不是我的attendance 不够?

我不是full attandance 但是我没有无故缺席。
95 巴仙有来阿。

我都不明白为什么。。。。

想了很久，越想就越心痛，痛，但是
这么样又能该变什么呢?

得失，得失，
不要看的太重，也不要太计较，计较，著耶稣会赐福的。



我很想把心思放在下一次。
我在毕业前要拿到3。3就是了。了。

一切交托在主耶稣的手中。
阿门。

家贼

我的家本来有个家贼，她是马六甲人，88年生的小妹妹，但是她似乎有个毛病，那就是爱偷东西。

她和她同房马六甲87的搬出去了，在前天晚上，当我还在模特儿公司那受训时，她们就收拾行李搬走了。

我很开心，虽然之后我和我现有的同居人将可能会因为找不到新人而又更重的经济负担，但我知道，至少我的衣服，钱财不会被那个女人偷走。

她们才搬家，在她们的新家第一天，就传出有人钱不见了。。。。。。。。。
那个遗失钱财的正好就是那个马六甲87。很巧吧!!!

我和我的同居人就说，可能那个马六甲88 不能控制她自己，她就是一定要偷东西，东西，不然就浑身不自在。在。

握想，这是不是因为魔鬼在她的体内呢?
我也就这样跟我自己说，说，人阿，若随情欲走，那么魔鬼就在他体内了，
基督徒若随情欲走，走，魔鬼定会趁机要你命的噢。


十戒
1。只有三位一体的上帝 是 神。
2。 不能拜偶像，仿佛上天下地所有的。。。。。。。。。
3。不妄称上帝的名
4。当守安息日为圣日，日，当天安息
5。当孝敬父母
6。不杀人
7。不奸淫
8。不偷盗
9。不做假见证陷害人
10。不贪恋别人的东西。。。。。。。。。

model

那个模特儿原来是Artistry 的模特儿。是化妆品的模特儿。
我有去见工，他们要用我。一个比较大型的show 将在两个\月后举行。
我阿。。。。
真的很感谢主耶稣给我这个机会去体验，虽然不是什么平面的模特儿，但我很开心了。了。

我们要相亲相爱

我家里的同屋人偷了我心爱的衣服。
我昼夜睡不着，一直想我可爱的衣服。
终于我在两个星期后就报警了，报警过后好开心。很舒畅。
我的朋友之后问我，我们这些基督徒，不是要给人抢了外衣连里衣也要给他么，不是给人打了左脸就连右脸也要给他打么。。。。
我顿时无话可说，
几秒钟过后，我说，耶稣不也叫我们要还税么，么，这世界掌权的不也是耶稣基督，上帝给吗?
所以我们遇贼了报警有什么不对呢?
基督徒是善良但不是白痴。

什么模特儿

我这个月，12。11。07 将会在kl ，不懂那个mall 当什么model.
听起来很怪，但帮我安排工作的那个人的确是只告诉我时间而已。。。。
我当然不是一个人去，我也约了我的一个女性朋友同去。 我呢，希望可以拿个好经验和
拍点美照片。

我很醒目的，不会给人骗啦。我们自己驾车去，不对路就在哪晚下就回家了。

我听他讲的好像是make up show 的model.

这个他--是我朋友的朋友，不懂信不信的过。
但是，现在这个年头，要一脱成名的傻\妹不懂几多啊，他是肯定不会逼我们做什么的。
我是法律系学生，多多少少懂得告人的阿。哈哈哈。

i just want to play.
Thanks GOD,giving me this chance to play.
have fun.

电脑

今天考的这科，是。其中考试时我是最高分的。 感谢主耶稣基督。
希望我这个大考也可顺利拿到好成绩。
我不是\强逼自己读书的人，我阿，是笨人。但我其的想读就读，尽本分。 也把这事交\\在主耶稣基督手中，中，成果如何，由主耶稣定，由主赐福
阿门。

孽或无知

昨晚，当我照常去我补习学生家中补习时，一切都照常。 但是，我发觉我的学生有所不同了。我是破例才收这个学生，我从不收中学生补习，每次都是幼稚园的和小学生
因为我怕大点的孩子难管。
果然，这个小男孩。。。。

唉。。。。

他或许是对性的无吧。他说要和我接吻。

我假装没听到。

今天，我到学校问了我同班男同学。

他说我应该用性教育角度去解说这个。不然小男孩很容易被\外界的性知识所误导。

我阿，从没有人教过我什么性教育，那么我又该怎样去教我的学生正确的性知识?

我是否该告诉他，接吻是大人的事，小孩不用懂?

又或者该说，接吻是对相爱得人之间的联系，是爱得表现，不可随意要求别人跟你接吻。 接吻也不是出自好奇，想尝试就尝试的东西。

我不懂下次，我学生问我时，我有没有勇气对他长编论一番。

不过求主耶稣给我力量正确的指导这个对性开始有兴趣的小孩。

阿门。

快考试了

考试快到了，\因此很烦。
我是不介意我自己有没有温习，因为我本来就很相信自己的能力，和上帝帮助。
可是，由于我期中考时还考不错，有几科更加是最高分，所以人人都看我是敌人了。
我没想过要比较，因为比较的心事来自恶魔的，我只想做好自己要的而已。
现在这样，。。。。。。。。

满头痛的。 考的好，人人都要跟我竞争。考不好又对不起自己。

所以要怎样啦。。。。。。。。

算了，了，我尽我本份读完该读的，之后就靠主了。

在握内心深处，我当然是希望考的好啦。

我是那么的辛苦供自己读书，读不好，是我自己的损失阿。

至于人们想比较，就别让人知道我的分数就好了。

我很讨厌有些人会去看我的分数，真是的。。。。。。

我很敏感有个人会去把握拿高分得事公告全世界。
不要啦。。。。我只想安安静静，平平稳稳，的过我的大学生涯。毕业时拿个2nd upper degree 就可以了。

不要搞我啦。

一切都交托在主耶稣的手中。

阿门。

恋爱不结婚

有个男人--他写了封信息给我，
‘你可以给我一个机会好好的爱你吗
年龄不用想，只要我们开开心心就可以了，我真的对你有那个感觉’

这是某个小我四岁的男人，我该说他是男孩说的。
一年内，不止他，还有超过不懂该用什么来计算的男人，男孩追求我。
我的朋友就说为什么不要?
可是我，真的不想就谈个开开心心，什么都不管的爱情。

以前，我谈过几次很自私很自私的恋爱，也是想这个 小男孩这样想。
开心就好。
我不理会我们是否相配，配，不理他本身有太多事物都与我有矛盾。连父母，姐姐的劝也不听了。
当时，我不在乎他学历比我低，家世比我差，身材样貌都无所谓，有怀习惯，抽烟喝酒，懒惰都可以忍受。
就连他开始用我的钱，我也忍了。现在想起来，当时真傻阿。

爱情地区是又情喝水饱，但是，未来呢。。。。。。。。。
不可能说今天有感觉就在一起，明天呢，还有很长的日子阿。
我明白，或许我的前男友们，其他追求我的男性都觉得我太贪慕虚荣，可是，我在成为任何一个人的女友前，我都主张各付各的。成了女友后除了电话费可拍拖的开销，我可没吃多一分钱。分手了，还是尤我给分手费。费。
还逢年过节送礼。以表心意和礼数。礼数。

不是要说自己好好阿，阿，还是什么的，
我就是非常的不满现今社会太多的男女，把恋爱当作游戏，没有认真的看待。看待。

的确，的确，钱财是买不到爱情，
圣经也有写，谁用财富来换取爱情就会被人蔑视。

一段好的爱情当然长长久久，要结婚生小孩一辈子的事阿。而且，还是两个家庭的连结。结。你的家族和他的将会有合并也有交际。如果说不理会其他因素就硬是要结合，那么往后怎么办。。。。。。。。。?

男方不赚钱回家样妻小，女方拼命做生做死来养家糊口的家庭我不是没见过。
因为男方家族豪门，豪门，女方嫁过去了抬不起头的也大有人在。

这些不完美的婚姻都源自恋爱。
恋爱，在还没选定人时，时，为什么不现作考量。考量。很多很残忍，很现实的条件，条件，周围，环境因素都应该设入考量。


我就是想太多，太多，所以就趁爱情还没蒙芽就把她给杀了。了。

我是个在读住大学的小妞，读完了，很大可能还要出国。出国。
以后，以后，我都不打算长住KL.
我还有很多地方还没\去，去，还没\流浪全世界。。。。
UK,Us,Australia, Japan, ..China.

父母那方面，方面，我还未\尽孝道。孝道。
主耶稣的使命，我也为完成。成。

\恋爱游戏对我而言，太奢侈。奢侈。

我跟自己说，说，再谈恋爱，就是样结婚，结婚，成家立业。成家立业。\安定的时候了。了。

不是现在，要再过好多年阿。
虽然有时我很累，累，很想找个人陪，陪，找个人来爱我。
可是，这样只要一时满足的爱是太\自私了。了。

现在，现在，我宁愿每天一早醒来就把微笑把爱带给我身旁的每一个人。
这就是爱。爱。
让自己活在主 的爱中。中。 比起所有的，都幸福许多。

More Conflict

http://www.aliran.com/oldsite/monthly/2004b/9e.html

for more cases and conflict between articel 11 civil and syariah in Malaysia can refer to above website.
thankx.

CIVIL-SYARIAH CONFLICT

The Susie Teoh dilemma
Susie Teoh was 17 years and 8 months when she became Muslim. Her father Teoh Eng Huat, a Buddhist, could not locate her and he took the Jabatan Agama in Kelantan to court. He applied for a declaration that, as father and guardian to the infant, he had a right to decide her religion, education and upbringing and that her conversion to Islam was invalid. The case was covered by the Guardianship of Infants Act, 1961, a federal law of general application, Art. 11 (1) (freedom of religion), and Art. 12 (3), (4) (right to education) of the Federal Constitution. The High Court ruled that the father’s right to decide the religion and upbringing of the infant (under 18) is allowed “subject to the condition that it does not conflict with the principles of the infant’s choice of religion guaranteed to her under the Federal Constitution”. In other words, the infant has a right to choose her own religion if she does it on her own free will. Susie Teoh was not in court to testify if she had voluntarily become Muslim “as her whereabouts were unknown”. The Supreme Court overruled the decision of the High Court and held that “in all the circumstances and in the wider interests of the nation no infant shall have the automatic right to receive instruction relating to any other religion other than (her) own without the permission of the parent or guardian”.

The Supreme Court, however, did not proceed with the declarations sought by Teoh Eng Huat as these were “only of academic interest” as Susie Teoh had reached the age of majority by the time the case was heard in the Supreme Court in 1990.



The aftermath It might be noted that several states have passed provisions in state Islamic laws by this time providing for the Islamic age of conversion at baligh, the age of adulthood which is stipulated as 15 for boys and the age of the onset of menstruation for girls. Thus, there is a clear difference between the age of conversion under Islamic law and that under civil law (which is 18, the age of majority). In 1989, the Selangor state lawmakers passed an additional amendment to the Administration of Islamic Law Enactment (a state Islamic law) to provide that if an adult converts to Islam, any infant children become converted at the same moment.

The passage of this law in the state assembly was opposed by lawmakers from the Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA) and the Democratic Action Party (DAP). It, nevertheless, became law after securing the required majority. This provision was eventually ‘repealed’ by its non-inclusion in a future amendment to that state law after a public outcry. Eventually state Islamic laws on the conversions of infants were synchronized with the position under civil law. An infant below age 18 requires the permission of both parents and guardian in a conversion to Islam. This appears to be a sound reconciliation.


Chang Ah Mee case: landmark decision In Chang Ah Mee’s case, the father became Muslim without the knowledge of the mother. He converted Junior Staphie Khoo, the child to the marriage, without knowledge and consent of the infant’s mother on July 28, 1998. The mother obtained custody on Nov. 13, 1998 and sought a declaration that the conversion of the infant was void. To recap, Susie Teoh was not converted to Islam by her parent. She received religious instruction in Islam (not known whether voluntarily or by compulsion) without the knowledge and consent of her father. In Chang Ah Mee, the infant was converted to Islam by the father. The High Court in Chang Ah Mee disposed of the case by addressing two issues: (1) the jurisdiction of the High Court on the matter and (2) the status of the conversion. In disposing of the jurisdiction issue, the court said that the case involved an interpretation of a state law and a civil court has such a jurisdiction even if the state law is one concerning the administration of Islamic law. Although it was not mentioned specifically in the case, the court looked at the whole situation as one primarily involving the guardianship and custody rights of parents over infants. In this scenario, the relevant laws involve the interpretation of four sets of laws:
Art. 12 of the Constitution on right to education;

The Guardianship of Infants Ordinance (Sabah) as amended in 1999 (“AMLE Sabah”);
The Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act, 1976 (“the Law Reform Act’); and
The Administration of Islamic Law Enactment 1992 (Sabah). Art.12 provides:

Rights in respect of education(
1) Without prejudice to the generality of Art. 8 (equality clause), there shall be no discrimination against any citizen on the grounds only of religion, race, descent or place of birth ...
(3) No person shall be required to receive instruction in or take part in any ceremony or act of worship of a religion other than his own.
(4) For the purposes of cl. (3) the religion of a person under the age of eighteen years shall be decided by his parent or guardian.

Although Art. 12 (3) mentions “parent or guardian” (singular), the court was not persuaded that Art. 12 intents that only one parent may determine the religion of an infant below 18 in Art. (4). This is because the “Constitution does not discriminate against the sexes….the term ‘parent’ in Art. 12 (4) must necessary mean both the father and the mother….To construe otherwise would mean depriving, for example, a mother of her right as a parent to choose the religion of the infant under Art. 12 (4), if the father alone decides on the religion to be followed by the infant”. The Guardianship of Infants Ordinance as amended gave both parents the same and equal right over the person and property of the infant. “Such a right is illusory unless it means that the husband and the wife must exercise them jointly, that is, it cannot be exercised by the one without the other save when the other has died”. Section 68 AMLE Sabah provides that “a person who is not Muslim may convert to Islam if he attains the age of baligh according to Islamic law and provided that if a person is below eighteen (18) years of age consent shall be obtained from the parents or his guardian”. To reiterate, this provision reconciles the position at both civil and Islamic law. A person who has reached the age of adulthood (baligh) under Islamic law (which may be less than 18) requires the consent of both parents or a guardian if that person has not reached 18 years of age. Section 69 AMLE Sabah spells out the formal requirements for a conversion, which includes the utterance of the affirmation of faith or shahadah made at the person’s free will. Having noted the positions of parents as guardian, the court said that the mother custodian has a right under section 89 (1) of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 (referred to as “the Law Reform Act”) to “decide all questions relating to the upbringing and education of the child”. The court did not clarify if this right supersedes the right of the other parent. In my view, this point strengthens the constitutional argument that both parents have a right to determine the religion of the infant and that the person who has custody of the infant should not be side-stepped in all questions relating to the upbringing and education of the infant (especially in the case where guardianship reposes in another person, who is not a parent of the child). The court also considered the Qur’an (sura al-Baqarah: 256), which propounds that there shall be no compulsion in religion. Further, the infant a two-year old is not of the age of baligh to be able to utter the affirmation of faith. The conversion was therefore against AMLE Sabah as well and was therefore null and void. I think that this is a landmark decision. This is the first case after the Susie Teoh decision where the High Court had an opportunity to interpret the laws, both Islamic law (as legislated for the state of Sabah) and civil law, including the provision on fundamental liberties in Art. 12, in a case of conversion to Islam.


The Shamala cases The Chang Ah Mee case was not followed in Shamala.
A High Court decision is persuasive to another High Court, as both are courts of coordinate jurisdiction.
There were four Shamala hearings. This article refers to three hearings dated Sept. 11, 2003 (No. 1), April 13, 2004 (No.2) and July 20, 2004 (No.3) below. In Shamala (No. 2) decided on April 13, 2004, the High Court in Kuala Lumpur held that the civil court has no jurisdiction to hear the mother’s application for a declaration that the conversion of the infants to Islam without her consent was null and void.
The judge emphasized this point in Shamala (No. 3), decided on July 20, 2004 (unreported). He appeared to say that the court did not make any ruling on the conversion. There are, however, passages in both cases that appear to indicate that the court did not wish to disturb the change in status of the infants. Case No. 1: Syariah order not binding on non-Muslim wife Shamala (No. 1) decided on Sept. 11, 2003, was a hearing for several matters.


The mother sought committal proceedings against the father of the infants for a breach of the interim custody order of the High Court of April 17, 2003. The High Court had granted custody to the mother with access to the father. He failed to return the children to her on May 25, 2003. The mother also applied for declarations that she was not bound by any decisions, order or proceedings of the syariah court.


Shamala, the mother to the infants, married her husband under Hindu rites. The marriage was registered under the Law Reform Act. The husband became Muslim on Nov. 19, 2002 and he converted the infant children on Nov. 25, 2002 without the mother’s knowledge and consent. The parties were not divorced. The muallaf (convert) father had, without the knowledge of his wife and the High Court, obtained a custody order in the syariah court on Jan. 30, 2003. The High Court ruled that the custody order issued by the syariah court “did not change the interim civil court order” and the syariah court order “is not binding on the plaintiff wife who is non-Muslim”.


The interim custody order of the High Court and proceedings were binding on the Muslim husband as matters arising out of the Hindu marriage registered under the Law Reform Act. As his Hindu wife did not file for divorce, she remains “his unconverted wife” under this law.

The committal proceedings apply to the husband. Case No. 2: No jurisdiction to decide In Shamala (No. 2), decided on April 13, 2004, the custodian-mother sought a declaration that the conversion of the infants was void. She relied on Art. 12 (4) of the Constitution, the Guardianship of Infants Act, 1961, which gives equality of parental rights and section 95 (b) of the Administration of Islamic Law (Federal Territories) Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as “AMLE FT”). The Guardianship of Infants Act, 1961 on equality of parental rights is similar to the Guardianship of Infants Ordinance (Sabah) referred to in Chang Ah Mee’s case. AMLE FT and AMLE Sabah differ. AMLE FT uses the words “parent or guardian” and not “both parents or a guardian” as in AMLE Sabah. The court ruled that only the consent of one parent is required in the conversion to Islam of a person below 18 under AMLE FT. It held that this is also consistent with Art. 12 (4) which provides for the words, “parent or guardian”. In my view there are certain weaknesses in these reasons. Art. 12 did begin with the words, “Without prejudice to the generality of Article 8, there shall be no discrimination against any citizen on grounds only of religion..” Art. 8 is the provision on equality before the law. The court did not appear to read this as an equality provision of the rights of parents. It ruled that “parent” under Art. 12 (4) means the father.



The equality of parental rights provision under the Guardianship of Infants Act, 1961 was held inapplicable to the Muslim father. After holding the 1961 Act as inapplicable, the court applied the Susie Teoh reasoning that the father as guardian had a right to decide the religion of the infant. This is curious as Susie Teoh’s case relied on the 1961 Act rather than Art. 12 (4). The court also considered the fatwa (legal opinion) of the Mufti of the Federal Territory as persuasive on the facts.


The Mufti was of the opinion that the Muslim father is entitled to unilaterally convert the infants to Islam without the consent of the mother. The fatwa did not appear to cite any authoritative fiqh (opinions of jurists based on Qur’an and Sunnah of the Prophet) arguments used by the Mufti. We thus do not know the fiqh references relied upon to support the opinion. It will be noted that there is nothing in AMLE FT, passed by the legislature, that incorporates the principle enunciated in the Mufti’s fatwa. As a general rule, the codification of fiqh principles in state law or Islamic law in the Federal Territories indicate the legislature’s preferences or selection of fiqh opinions to become positive law.


If we refer to the Selangor state law in 1989 law on ‘automatic conversion of infants’ upon the conversion of a parent to Islam,
that law purport to use a hadith (reported sayings of the Prophet) as its basis. That hadith is not a well-established hadith in Islamic jurisprudence. In any case there is a clear and overriding Qur’anic injunction in sura al-Baqarah, verse 256, which states that there is no compulsion in religion. I did not read in the court’s judgment if these arguments were raised in court. After these exertions in several pages, the court concluded that it had no power or jurisdiction under Art. 121 (1A) of the Constitution to decide on the conversion of the infants. According to the court, Art. 121 (1A) ousts the civil jurisdiction over the infants who are now Muslims and the temporary certificates of their conversion are conclusive. In my view, this is a questionable application of the case law on Art. 121 (1A).



The cases cited on Art. 121 (1A) to support the proposition of ouster are cases of Muslim converts out of Islam. The decisions thus far concluded that until the state syariah court rules on the conversion out of Islam, the party concerned was still a Muslim. In other words, those cases cited are arguably limited to situations of conversions out of Islam. Shamala’s prayer relates to the conversion into Islam. In any case, I have my personal doubts if Art. 121 (1A) is meant to be used in this way at all.


This article does not include my arguments on this. Case No. 3: Mixed Signals Shamala (No. 3) decided on July 20, 2004 (not yet reported) was an application inter alia for custody, care and control of the infants. The court awarded custody to the mother with access to the father. The court held the “right of religious practice of the two infant children shall be exercised equally by both parents” as laid out in the Guardianship of Infants Act 1961 (despite ruling in Shamala (No.2) that the Act cannot apply to the Muslim father then). It also held that the law applicable to the infants at the time of their conversion is the civil law.

This clear statement appears incongruous to the court’s position in Shamala (No. 2), where it refused to make any decision on the conversion on ground that it had no jurisdiction. In Shamala (No. 3) the court even ruled that the infants were still Hindus “at the time of conversion” and the father should have consulted the mother before converting the infants. Despite this, it cautioned the Hindu mother from influencing the infants’ religious belief “by teaching them her articles of faith or by making them eat pork” as the court “cannot run away from the fact that the two infant children are now muallaf” and that “they have been issued with temporary certificates of Akuan Sementara Pengislaman ”.




These last sentences imply a preponderance on the part of the judge to accept the conversion of the infants to Islam despite his ruling in Shamala (No. 2) that it cannot decide on the change in status for lack of jurisdiction. The judgment did not cite section 89 (1) of the Law Reform Act, which gives parent-custodian of the civil marriage (which on the facts still subsist) the right to “decide all questions relating to the upbringing and education of the child”, when he cautioned the mother as above. Even without a meticulous legal critique of the reasons for the decision, one can see the problems in the Shamala reasoning.




Both Chang Ah Mee and the Shamala (No. 2 and 3) cases were decided by the High Court. Both cases had to decide on the status of the conversion of infants and custody. In my view, the Chang Ah Mee case was a better reasoned case. At the moment we have two cases of the High Court. Both are persuasive. Another High Court may decide differently or opt for either the Chang Ah Mee decision or the Shamala (no. 2) decision in a case on infant conversion to Islam.

Freedom of Religion

======================================================================================================================================================================================= The Coalition Called Article 11:
Myths and Facts What is Article 11 in the Federal Constitution?
It guarantees the freedom of religion. Article 11 reads as follows: ?
1. Freedom of religion.
(1) Every person has the right to profess and practise his religion and, subject to Clause (4), to propagate it.
(2) No person shall be compelled to pay any tax the proceeds of which are specially allocated in whole or in part for the purposes of a religion other than his own.
(3) Every religious group has the right -
(a) to manage its own religious affairs;
(b) to establish and maintain institutions for religious or charitable purposes; and
(c) to acquire and own property and hold and administer it in accordance with law.
(4) State law and in respect of the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur, Labuan and Putrajaya, federal law may control or restrict the propagation of any religious doctrine or belief among persons professing the religion of Islam.
(5) This Article does not authorise any act contrary to any general law relating to public order, public health or morality.

?What is the Article 11 coalition?

Article 11 is the name of a coalition of civil society groups from diverse backgrounds and interests. Why was the coalition formed? It was formed in May 2004 in response to cases that highlighted the problems faced by some Malaysians, which involve the interpretation of some provisions of the Federal Constitution.

Two examples are: Shamala was a Hindu mother whose husband converted to Islam. He converted their two infant children to Islam without her knowledge or consent. The civil High Court refused to give effect to Shamala's rights as a parent of the child, and ordered her to raise her children as Muslims and not expose them to her own Hindu faith. It said that since the children are now Muslims, the Syariah Court is the only qualified forum to determine their religious status, even though the judge acknowledged that the Syariah Court has no jurisdiction to hear Shamala's case since she is not a Muslim. As a result, Shamala did not have any avenue to seek relief. Moorthy, the Malaysian hero who climbed Mount Everest, died in December 2005. The Islamic religious authorities obtained a Syariah Court order, in his widow Kaliammal's absence, declaring him a Muslim when he died. Kaliammal tried to have her deceased husband declared a Hindu at the time of his death, but the civil courts refused to hear her case. She was therefore left with no remedy and no access to justice. What is the mission of the coalition? Article 11's mission is to ensure a Malaysia that: upholds the supremacy of the Federal Constitution; protects every person equally, regardless of religion, race, descent, place of birth or gender; and is firmly established in, and upholds, the rule of law.

What does Article 11 hope to achieve?

We aim to promote awareness towards, advocate for and contribute to achieving a Malaysia where all Malaysians in our daily lives: affirm the Federal Constitution as the supreme law of the land; strive to build national unity; affirm the right of every person to full and adequate access to justice; recognise the need for a judiciary that is impartial, independent, and an equal arm of the government; recognise that the Federal Constitution embodies an agreement among the various communities; respect the Constitutional guarantees of equal protection for every person in a multi-racial, multi-religious Malaysia; seek to protect fundamental liberties for all; respect the freedom of thought, conscience, belief and religion of every person; and ensure that Malaysia does not become a theocratic state.

What activities has the coalition engaged in thus far?

Open letter In June 2006, Article 11 handed over to the Prime Minister an open letter entitled eaffirming the supremacy of the Federal Constitution? bearing approximately 20,000 signatures. The letter calls upon the government/judiciary: to uphold the supremacy of the Federal Constitution; to ensure governance in accordance with the Federal Constitution and premised on the universal values of all Malaysian peoples; to reaffirm that Malaysia shall not become a theocratic state; and to recognise the proper position of the judiciary within the Constitutional framework, as an independent and equal arm of Government.

See http://www.petitiononline.com/constsup/petition.html for the open letter.

The coalition has repeatedly asked to meet the Prime Minister to discuss the open letter and other issues of concern, but no reply has yet been received. Public forums Since 2004, Article 11 has been involved in organising five public forums that have focused primarily on the rights that the Federal Constitution, as the supreme law of Malaysia, guarantees to all persons living in Malaysia. The forums also highlighted the plight of various individuals who are unable to have access to justice. Unfortunately, two of those forums were disrupted by protests organised by a group calling itself Badan Anti IFC (BADAI), which incorrectly accused Article 11 of attempting to revive the Interfaith Commission (IFC) and of insulting Syariah law and Islam. Although a Minister had called the actions of the mob stuupid?

(see http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/51104),
and in spite of the increasing public support for the forums, the Government nevertheless went ahead and called for a halt to further forums on interfaith issues. Court and media advocacy Coalition members have represented persons who require assistance to pursue legal remedies. We have also appointed lawyers to hold a watching brief in court cases relating to lack of access to justice and freedom of religion. As part of the coalition's media advocacy work, members have granted interviews and released press statements and letters to press editors. Since the Government's gag order, Article 11 forums have been halted, and its statements are no longer carried by the press. On the other hand, groups opposing Article 11 continue to have access to the media and various other machineries to perpetuate disinformation about the coalition. Public education Article 11 has conducted briefings for groups and individuals who want to know more about their rights under the Constitution and about the coalition. Was it a mistake for Article 11 to discuss highly charged and sensitive?

issues in a public forum setting?
No. The public forums were closed-door sessions held in a regulated indoor setting, and all attendees were required to register. The forums featured activists, academics, lawyers and politicians as speakers, who discussed the Federal Constitution and related matters. The forums themselves proceeded smoothly, and nothing untoward happened during the meetings that caused any problem. The only disruptions originated from outside the forums, caused by persons unwilling to engage in rational dialogue and unwilling to allow others to exercise their freedom of expression. The issues may be sensitive?but they were always handled in a mature, professional and rational manner. Moreover, discussing sensitive?issues in an open and responsible manner is in fact the way to foster mutual understanding and true harmony. Avoiding discussion because an issue is sensitive?

will perpetuate its sensitivity and enhance the prejudices that will exist and grow among respective groups or communities because opportunities for dialogue are absent. What does Article 11 plan to do, in light of the protests against the forums?
We cannot be united if we do not talk to one another about what is troubling us. Suppression of debate will not resolve problematic issues nor cause them to fade away. It is important that we discuss and explore different viewpoints to facilitate solutions to the issues that jeopardise our national unity. Article 11 hopes to engage in rational dialogues with all concerned to clarify the misconceptions about the coalition, and to continue with its public education activities. Article 11 also hopes to meet the Prime Minister and other decision-makers to discuss issues of concern. Does Article 11 aim to establish the IFC? This is not one of Article 11's objectives, although some of the individuals and groups that had participated in the IFC initiative are also involved in Article 11. The IFC was intended to be a statutory body with a conciliatory function to promote the national unity of the people of multiple faiths in Malaysia. Despite the misinformation spread by irresponsible persons, the proposed IFC was not intended to have adjudicatory functions. Article 11 is a separate initiative. There is no discussion about the IFC in Article 11's public forums or other activities. Does Article 11 oppose the position of Islam in Malaysia? No. Article 11 respects Article 3(1) of the Federal Constitution, which states that islam is the religion of the Federation; but other religions may be practised in peace and harmony in any part of the Federation.?We also uphold Article 4(1), which provides that the Federal Constitution is the supreme law of Malaysia. Does Article 11 and its activities interfere with, or insult, Islam? No. None of the forum speakers or Article 11 coalition members questions the application of Syariah law to Muslims in the area of their personal and family law. The coalition, however, is concerned about the areas of conflict between Syariah law and civil law, and their negative impact on the rights of all individuals. Does Article 11 aim to reduce the power of the Sultans and religious authorities? No. Article 11 has the utmost respect for the Sultans as constitutional monarchs, and for the religious authorities who are subject to the Federal Constitution and are bound to uphold the rule of law. Does Article 11 aim to reduce the status of Syariah Court? No. What we advocate has been the position in Malaysia since independence and will not reduce the Syariah Court's scope within the Federal Constitution's framework. However, in any case where one party to a dispute does not profess Islam, or where the State Legislature has not expressly legislated on the subject matter of the dispute, then the correct position should be that the civil courts must be the ultimate decision-maker. If all parties to a dispute profess Islam, and the subject matter of the dispute is one of purely Islamic personal law and which has been legislated upon by the State Legislature, then the civil courts can rightly decline to interfere with a dispute before the Syariah Court. The current situation is problematic because individuals who do not profess Islam are being nevertheless told to go to the Syariah Court for redress, i.e. to go to a court to whose jurisdiction they are not subject. What is Article 11's stand on apostasy?

The coalition believes that the clear provision in Article 11(1) of the Constitution, that every person has the right to freely profess and practise ?his religion? must be fully respected. We do not encourage Muslims to renounce Islam, and we acknowledge that Article 11(4) restricts the propagation of any religious doctrine or belief among Muslims. Laws can be put in place to ensure that persons who convert out of their religion do not evade any lawful obligations to their families and communities. It is not suggested that such laws would prevent, punish or deter the conversion itself, but such laws must ensure that conversion does not provide an escape route from obligations already incurred. Is Article 11 seeking a repeal of Article 121(1A) of the Constitution? No. Article 121(1A) states: the [civil High Courts] shall have no jurisdiction in respect of any matter within the jurisdiction of the Syariah courts.?This just means that if a matter is properly and exclusively within the Syariah Courts' jurisdiction, the civil High Courts will not exercise jurisdiction over it. This proper interpretation does not take away anything from the Syariah Courts' proper jurisdiction. The jurisdictional conflict that has arisen is not due to the written law but to a distorted reading of Article 121(1A).


======================================================================================================================================================================================= Background to the formation of Article 11 In April 2004,

the civil High Court in Kuala Lumpur granted custody of 2 young boys aged 2 and 4 years to their Hindu mother. The judge imposed one condition - she was not to expose her sons to her Hindu faith. The 2 boys were previously, without her knowledge or consent, converted to Islam by her estranged husband, himself a recent convert to Islam. The same court had earlier dismissed an application by the Hindu mother for a declaration that the conversion of the 2 young children to Islam violated her parental right to co-determine the religious upbringing of the children. The reasoning of the court was that it had no jurisdiction, as the children were now Muslim and the correctness or otherwise of their conversion was a matter for the Syariah Court. Shamala's case brought home the point that the constitutional role of the civil High Court as the protector of the rights of the ordinary citizen was fast becoming illusory. The implications of this case, however, became the rallying force that drew together a small number of concerned NGOs and members of civil society. This group noted that besides Sharmala's case, there were other cases that had impacted the right of belief and the right to practise one's belief as guaranteed under Article 11 of the Federal Constitution. By May 2004, Shamala's case had given life to a coalition of NGOs, which has come to be known as Article 11.

above is articel is from the www.article11..

My assignment

thursday i have to pass up my Constitution law assignment.
the title is freedom of religion in Malaysia based on artcle 11 in Federal Constitution Act.

I am quite happy to do this assignment.
because i've million thousand words to say.

Freedom, is this call freedom???
maybe it's freedom, with term and condition.

Many other news can refer to ---

http://exmuslim.com/news.htm

Freedom Of Religion?

Christian who married ex-Muslim detained WND ^ September 24, 2003 staff
Posted on 09/24/2003 11:07:42 AM PDT by Nachum
An Egyptian Christian who married a Muslim convert to Christianity was pulled off an international flight this afternoon in Cairo, Egypt, and is being held by Egyptian secret police.
Bolis Rezek-Allah had an immigrant visa to Canada, according to the U.S.- based monitor Voice of the Martyrs, or VOM.
His wife, Enas Badawi, also is sought by police but has not been apprehended, VOM said.
Egypt bars Christian men from marrying Muslim women. The government, refusing to recognize Badawi's conversion, still recognizes her as a Muslim.
"It is interesting that the Egyptian government has no problem with Muslim men marrying Christian women," said VOM spokesman Todd Nettleton in a statement. "But they won't recognize the right of Christian men to marry Muslim women."
Nettleton noted the Egyptian government claims to give its citizens religious freedom.
"There is complete freedom for Christians if they want to convert to Islam, but no freedom for Muslims to choose to follow Christ," he said

Fasting...

Now is Muslims' fasting month.
but i know many muslims did not fasting.
just look around me, my ex malay housemates. They do acting like thy're fasting, but in fact...they eat twice than usual.

Chinese have Hungry Ghost Festival, is this is Malay's Hungry Ghost Festival?

emm.. no answer..

I just know that, in this month , my campus only left one Indian cafe open, and i forced to fasting like them too.
BAd!!!

And , if i thristy, i have to hide and drink my water like it's sinful to do so.

Hello. i am chines, and christian, not muslim. !!!!

Sigh...

new pics

1st is---my hair dyes with 4 coulours.

2nd is i take pic in my bathroom, (i 'm not naked)

and i think this 2 pic quite nice, so i put it here.

We can Judge people?

This is what the hostess of the VMAs said after Britney’s performance; it is reportedly the reason why Britney was so shaky during her performance:
“This is so exciting, wasn’t that incredible? Miss Britney Spears everyone. She is amazing, I mean she is 25 years old and has already accomplished everything she is going to accomplish in her life. It’s mind blowing, and she’s so grown up. She’s a mother, you know it’s crazy to think that just a few years ago on this very show she was this like sweet innocent little girl in slutty clothes riding around with a python. Thats not nice calling Madonna a python. But have you seen Britney’s kids? Oh my god. They are the most adorable mistakes you have ever seen. They are so cute. There as cute as the hairless vagina they came out of. “
What a bitch
===================================================================


I just want to say:

WHEN WE JUDGE SOMEONE, WE ACTUALLY JUDGE OURSELF.


Briteny she have been longtimes not perfome,and the nite actually she did it well. Can u do half like what she done?
cannot!!!
She's Britney Spears, she 's born to be star.

我刚刚看了本好好看的书----欲女
在中国网挖到的。
不错，看到快流泪了。


这几天不知是不是老毛病发作了，满想找个男友。
不过我是很确定我不要性，有爱不能有性。
性在我看来是很神圣的，若我们在污辱了他，那么爱情就不久了。

我也知道这年头要找个不用做sex 的男人士很难的，我重申做love和做sex是不同的。
做爱是真心相爱，有了名正言顺后，不用担心怀孕阿，用不用保险套阿之后就可以开开心心的做。做。
而后者是用男女朋友之名，认识不久就扑上床，。。。。。。。。。
我阿,
i cannot agree with this kind of relationship.
我是否太老头了，或是啊婆吧。。。。。。。。。。


我要我的男友尊敬我就好了。了。如果一个男人尊敬你，他就不会硬要求\上床了，了，他以为你是狗吗?


May GOD BLESS .
女人要自爱阿。

Freindship Forever

23.08.07 i won the " The most gorgeous dress" for Law and commerce sociaty 's annual dinner nite.
Quite happy .

Thank GOD.
And all my friends.

I JUST WANT TO LEARN ...cApOeIrA

Capoeira Basics

Let me tell you that I just a beginner in the art of Capoeira;
1st times i know thgis art is from TEKKEN. I really like this martial art, even though i 'v learn teakwando, and other wu shu.
But this art really unit and super.
Look like dance, but it's fighting.
WaoH.

General Rules:
In Capoeira you don't try to beat the out of your opponent. The other one is not your enemy, he is your friend, and both of you try to keep the game going. Therefore no bleeding noses please.
No active blocking in Capoeira; instead try to be evasive. When the pace of the game increases, get some distance between yourself and your fellow (at least in Regional).
Don't be predictable. That may sound hackneyed, but since Malandragem (dirty tricks) is accepted and widely welcomed among Capoeiristas, you can easily get tricked into some serious trouble. Be creative and let the music take controhoholl

成绩

虽然成绩还没出，可是呢，应该可以吧。
其中的罪案法已经知道了，我过关了，还不错呢。
至于我最担心的金融。。。。。。。。
还是默默祷告吧。


今天在学校看到两只可怜的小猫，被丢在人来人往的走道上，怪可怜的。 满担心它们。。。。
愿主耶稣保守赐福。


我很想养它们，但是目前我仍是与人同屋，就不方便养。

多想念我以前养的那五只猫阿。

4 in d Morning

Gwen Stefani - 4 In The Morning lyrics

Waking up to find another day
The moon got lost again last night
But now the sun has finally had it's say
I guess I feel alright
But it hurts when I think
When I let it sink in
It's all over me

I'm lying here
in the dark
I'm watching you sleep,
it hurts a lot& all I know is
You've got to give me everything

Nothing less cause
You know I give you all of me


[CHORUS]
I give you everything that I am
I'm handin' in everything that
I've gotCause
I wanna have a really true love
Don't ever wanna have to go
& give you up

Stay up till
Four In The Morning &
the tears are pouring&
I want to make it worth the fight


What have we been doing for all this time?
Baby if we're gonna do it, come on do it right
All I wanted was to know I'm safe
Don't want to lose the love I've found
Remember when you said that you would change
Don't let me downIt's not fair how you areI can't be complete,
can you give me more?&
all I know isYou got to give me everything& nothing less cause
You know I give you all of me




[CHORUS]

I give you everything that I am I'm handin' in everything that I've got
Cause I wanna have a really true love
Don't ever wanna have to go & give you up
Stay up till Four In The Morning &
the tears are pouring& I want to make it worth the fight

What have we been doing for all this time?
Baby if we're gonna do it,
come on do it right

Oh please, you know what I need
Save all your love up for me
We can't escape the love
Give me everything that you have& all I know is
You got to give me everything& nothing less cause
You know I give you all of me

[CHORUS]

I give you everything that I am I'm handin' in everything that I've got
Cause I wanna have a really true love
Don't ever wanna have to go & give you up
Stay up till Four In The Morning & the tears are pouring& I want to make it worth the fight

What have we been doing for all this time?

Baby if we're gonna do it, come on do it right
(Give you everything)(Give you all of me)

No Boy friend..

I told my friends that i am so admire they have boy friend.
then they say they can find one ,and if i want sure have many boy baoy want to take the vacancy.
But i tell them, yes, i want to have bf, but i am strictly want to have a relationship without " fucking". (i mean have sex)
i dont want to have sex with my boy friend, that's nasty and i'll feel so much guilty.
now, i just want to make friends.
if any one who really mean to be with me, i think he wil respect my will.

EXAm!!!

eXAM EXAM EXAM. THIS is my exam week, very tension. everything just come so fast and i seem like hard to handle it.
i hope will get better soon.

monday , my malaysian studies paper --- i know i have do one big mistake about the historical for brunei....

tuesday... the ict... so far i think what i write is just too long... maybe over ...

today for my constitutionla, i ma very tension, very nervous, i write the thing just like repeat and repeated...
i hope my lecturer dont mind.

JESUS HELP.

tomorrow is my Tort paper... i not yet cover up.
saturday have 2 papers and after exam , i have to rush to bus station to penang islang visit my sis.
Very rush....
hopefully GOD BLESS.

(my finance very bad...why it come together with criminal paer?.....hard and add somemore harder. )

HELP!!

是他吗

我最近认识了一个男孩.
he's Christian, same age with me. take business it.
i feel so right with him, he's cool.
he come from my homtown too.
Is him my true love ?
God, let me know.

问题

问题解决又有问题,新人们以为我有从中得到好处,钱阿之类的,风扇的control没电池,要从我这claim....!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Resident Card RM 20有要从我这Claim阿!
Even though, JULY 我给她们住FREE ,免租,可是她们好像不懂行情阿.哪里找FREE的住所噢.

我真的无言以对阿.主耶稣,我把这问题交在你手中,希望她们了解也明白我的难处.
和状况.

到我这里来。。

耶稣说‘到我这里来，我就使你们得安息，。。。。。。’

我相信这是真的，士绝对的。我再一次把我的问题交在主手中，也在一次有了好结果。

感谢主，阿门。

感谢主

感谢主，我已经把问题都解决了。屋子都满人了，而且都是华人。

我也有要帮那两个马来人搬屋子，我找到一千块的屋子给她们，而她们只需要在学校的市场部等新人搬进就可以了，结果她们不领情。
算了，幸福不会自己跑来的。



感谢主，啊门。

付出

我们要怎样的为主所用?
我..... 不等待,我把我现有的拿出来吧!
SKY IS IN WHAT COLOUR?
ACTUALLY IT'S NOT BLUE.
so why should we wait for the thing that we don't know?
just move.

RAPE

RAPE ----section 375 of Penal Code (ACT 574) Malaysia.

今天很开心,
today learn about cases---rape.
why i ma happy?
hahha. because in malaysia, in that code , rape punishment is only for man.
whoever man committed rape can be punish, but not women.
according to my lecturer, because there are no women rape man, only mna rape women. and without man'will,women can do nothing for that rape.
so, ...

why i am so happy, because just now in the class i debated with my coursemates(guy)about this Act, my other coursemates(women) all support me.
we're all happy to this rule.
man conduct rape can be in jail for 5----20 years and whipping.
emm. we think that this punishment is not heavy enough.

if i can change something, i will like to make that punishment up to life imprisonment.
longlife in jial.
hahah.

Dennis YiN

Name: Dennis Yin Zhen Huang
DOB: 28th November 1988
Age: 19
Gender: : Male
From: Subang Jaya, Selangor
Education: BA. Mass Communication & Psychology, SEGI College
Occupation: Student
eEMMmm... ok, take BA.mass communication & psychology at SEGI College.
haha, i can find him there. hehe.
Emmm, that's double degree or double course...?
is that something course similar like Ba .of law and commerce...
/ BA. Accounting & finance...?
This is his latest pic.
Take at 29 JUNE 2007.

生命的短暂

我们可以活到几岁呢
谁可以回答我
没有人可以预测未来，天的我是怎样的，我不能够知道。生命非常的脆弱也很难预测，我阿，不就只是个人吗
我能够做些什么
还能在我人生中多做些什么
我常常读遍千万本书，我还是找不到答案。
一直到那天-------------我翻阅了圣经，我信了主耶稣，我才白了生命的奥秘。

我们人类，不知道的事太多了，了，我们如果说没有神 然后打算以科学来代替神 那么我们只会找到更多的文而不是答案。

如果今天的呢不同意我所说的 神 ，非常欢迎你去找答案。

或许你会说 神有很多，不一定是我的 神 才是真的，那么呢，我也很欢迎你去查找历史，你就会发现圣经说的确有此事。
真金不怕烘炉火就是这么一回事。

主耶和华 是
唯一真神，是三位一体的主，圣父，圣子，圣灵。
永世常存著。
不信耶稣是上帝的独生子的，也就不信 神 了。
主耶稣也是从古至今唯一死而复活的神 。

想一想吧，其他所谓的神，是不是死了，变粪土了。所以呢，他救不了自己，还能救你吗?

主耶稣战胜了死亡，只有信主耶稣才是唯一得救的道路。
阿门。

改革

从今开始，我的部落格将会贴上一些属灵的散文。
今天是第一天，那么就来说简单的那个话题------------



你死后会去哪里！

你是否BELIEVE GOD?

DO YOU KNOW WHERE YOU WILL GO ?

Busy days...

My days' busy, i wonder why i chose this way. everyday i have to go Uni, after that go work part-time.
at nite have to pratice my guitar.
(i'll have my own band soon)

But reflex it all, i 'm busy and tired but i am happy.
this is the power to make me this dead body to be alive and move on.
JESUS thanks for watchin' me.

ok.

take a deep breath.
back to work .

Muarks. i'm so happy to be alive.

HaZeE TaKE

Haha. My latest Pic.

i look a bit like -----blur Blur....

haha.

Dennis..

Lastnite i went to sunway piramid shoppin.

and very surprisely...!i meet dennis from (so you think you can dance ) final contestant.

haha.

he look so handsome, far more handsome and smart than in the TV screen.

I forget to show this photo to him after take.

so ... (i am a bit over excited...)

after i take this pic, i just like blind.... and when i asw my friend , i just can think nothing, but left the place to share this pic to my friend.

I hope this act not hurt dennis feeling.

ok la.

stop here.

i 've to go class now.

MUARKS!!

i always support Dennis.

yoO!

my decision

lastnite when i go back home. my housemates say they want to move to new house with me, and she cooked a chicken rice for me.
OK, well..
if she treat me good, sure i will treat her good, or i will blame her like i am a crazy .
(after that in our daily conversation she speak more than twice that " you're crazy)
even though she's smiling when she said that word, but i know she's defame my name.
. she 's not respect me , i have to stop her continuingly to defame my name.
next-time , if i hera she come out the word--crazy--, i will sure give her an unforgetable treat.


I am a nice person, but the greatest nice person also have a limits.
so do i.
i just a normal people, i have my temper too.
take acre , and be careful of my burst anger.

Wait and see.

can I be Cruel..?!

last-nite something happen to me.
my housemates been attacked by my cat, then thay want me to lock up the cat all of the cat's lifetime until that cat die....
i am very sad and angry about that.
soon i will move already to new house, and they (i men my current housemate)will follow me to move.
From the bottom of my heart, i don't wish to move with them. but the house is quite expensive. so i have to move with them or i have to find someone to replace them .
I don't know how to do , how to solve this problem.
AND ONE MRE THING----now that house still have one room vacancy, and looking for people to share, i ask my housemates to find people,(because i find the house and the electronic ,furniture and kitchen stuff).
so,i think there must be someone to share the effort bulild up this.
But then ... they're not move , they do nothing... . i hear no news. i am quite disaapointed with them. in the end , i guess i rather move alone.
they sleep beside street la. (i still give them a treat to the new house is because they asked to stay with me in the early of the year. )
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
sigh.. ... ... .... .... .... .... ....

I want evryone happy , but i don't want to make myself feel so bad, and $$$ also a factor to think...
i ... have no idea...
and my cats, i have one big cat and 4 kitten. i don't know where to put that cats.

They say i am selfish , but have they ever think about me???

I ... ... ...

I been educated not to asy no to other, but this make me like a fool.
Can i be cruel to other in case to protect myself?

I have a plan, if in the early of july, they still find no-one or they're not intend to do something,
then i will move with my others friend.
Which very nice to me , and she rear cats. (her cat's my cats friend too . )

I am selfish and cruel.. so what.
that might be the last words i say to them .

haha.

don't blame me.

Celebrity..hairstyles

emm... if i cannot find a suitable hairstyle for myself...

i guess .. i will that this....

O~ NO>>>>!!!!!

Ayumi's look

hair-styles n star.

Britney spear in billion looks!!

Emm... actually Avril don't have many change in her hair styles.

I wish to see she have short hair..

PUNK!!!

I still consider she is Rock punk star. becasue usually pop-princess have to be change thier inmage almost evryday.

Sexy DIVA Beyonce

she change her ahirstyles, see..?!

So, she is in R n B pop diva. category.